Is it Time for Chesapeake to Hand McClendon His Walking Papers?

From Matt Koppenheffer at The Motley Fool:
In May, I wrote that Aubrey McClendon needed to be shown the door as Chesapeake Energy's (NYSE: CHK  ) CEO. Given the historical precedent of shareholders inexplicably supporting McClendon and his merry band of board members, I didn't think his departure was possible. Today, I'd be surprised if it didn't happen. 
A good deal has happened in two months. The most recent revelation -- that Chesapeake may have colluded with competitor Encana (NYSE: ECA  ) in land auctions -- wascovered by Brian Stoffel earlier this week. The accusation is no joke. Brian noted:
Colluding with a competitor to hold prices down for land would be in direct violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and carry stiff penalties. Companies could be fined up to $100 million -- and individuals $1 million -- for each offense. Additionally, victims of the rigging can receive up to triple what they missed out on.
That follows a tsunami of other reports detailing questionable dealings by McClendon -- from borrowing more than $1 billion against personal Chesapeake well interests to running a commodity hedge fund while at the helm of the natural-gas producer. 
It's a laundry list of missteps that shareholders simply couldn't let slide, and as a result they've taken a hatchet to Chesapeake's board and governance practices. McClendon was stripped of his chairman title. Under pressure from the company's two largest shareholders --Southeastern Asset Management and Carl Icahn -- four directors were replaced by new directors named by Southeastern and Icahn. It was a massacre at the annual shareholders' meeting:
  • The two directors up for election, Burns Hargis and Richard Davidson, received 26% and 27%, respectively, of the votes cast. They both tendered their resignations.
  • Majority voting for directors was approved with 97% of the votes cast (replacing supermajority voting, which requires two-thirds of outstanding shares to vote for a change).
  • Approval of executive compensation was rejected with only 20% of the votes cast.
  • Approval of the annual incentive plan was rejected with only 31% of the votes cast.
  • Reincorporation in Delaware -- which would improve shareholders' rights -- was approved with 53% of votes cast.
  • Majority voting for all shareholder proposals -- again replacing supermajority voting -- was approved with 86% of the votes cast.
  • "Shareholder proxy access," which allows substantial, long-term shareholders to nominate directors for the company's board, was approved with 60% of the votes cast.
Clearly, shareholders were ready for a change.
Read the rest of the article here.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Popular posts from this blog

Fracktivist in Dimock Releases Carefully Edited Video, Refuses to Release the Rest

The Second Largest Oil and Gas Merger - Cabot and Cimarex

Josh Fox Takes Another Approach to Attacking Oil & Gas Industry: They Don't Care About Worker Safety