Activist Shares Reasons He Feels EPA's Report on Fracking and Water is Inadequate

From Southern Maryland Online:
When the Environmental Protection Agency published its recent draft report saying fracking is not a “widespread” hazard to drinking water, industry supporters grabbed onto the statement like a Florida alligator grabbing dinner.

American Petroleum Institute Upstream Group Director Erik Milito declared “the evidence gathered by EPA confirms … hydraulic fracturing is being done safely under the strong environmental stewardship of state regulators and industry best practices.”

Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said the report showed: “dirty oil and gas fracking contaminate drinking water.”

The report made both points — and neither of them. In an excellent example of political obfuscation, carefully created with “more than five years and millions of (taxpayer) dollars,” the report hangs on one word: “widespread.” In other words, fracking in one section of a state probably does not directly affect water supplies in another.
Continue reading this article by clicking here.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Popular posts from this blog

Company Looking for Permission to Build Two New Injection Wells in Ohio

US Postal Service Subpoenas Chesapeake Energy on Royalty Payments