Beck Energy and XTO Scores Huge Victory for Drillers in Ohio Lease Case

From the law firm of Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty, which represented Beck Energy and XTO in a very important leasing case before the Seventh District Court of Appeals in Ohio, comes this release:
Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty oil and gas attorneys, Scott M. ZurakowskiWilliam G. Williams, Aletha M. Carver andGregory W. Watts successfully defended energy company, Beck Energy Corporation, in a significant case in the Seventh District Court of Appeals,  Hupp, et al. v Beck Energy Corp., 2014–Ohio–4255.  The decision impacts virtually every oil and gas producer (both local and national) who owns lease rights and/or is drilling in the Utica shale. 
The significance of Hupp et. al. v. Beck Energy Corp., 2014–Ohio–4255: 
  • The decisions of the Monroe County Common Pleas Court (Trial Court) (July 31, 2013, February 8, 2013 and June 10, 2013) overturned over 100 years of well- settled oil and gas case law in Ohio causing serious uncertainty to drillers and producers.
  • The Seventh District Court of Appeals’ Opinion reversed the prior Monroe County Common Pleas Court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of the lessors/landowners when it determined that the Beck Energy GT 83 Lease void ab-initio as against public policy in Ohio.
  • The Seventh District Court of Appeals’ Opinion put to rest the following main areas that lessors/landowners were using to attack and void longstanding oil and gas leases: 
  • The Beck Energy GT 83 Lease is not a no-term lease.  It contains two distinct terms – a primary term and secondary term;
  • The Beck Energy GT 83 Lease contains no implied covenants and the fact that the lease contains language that requires a lessor to provide a lessee notice of any express or implied obligation, does not create any implied covenants under the lease;
  • The ability of Beck Energy to pay delay rentals, during the primary term, does not mean the lease is a perpetual lease that can last forever;
  • The phrase “capable of production” in the sole judgment of the lessee – does not mean the Lease is a perpetual lease as Beck Energy is subject to  a good faith standard; and
  • The phrase “capable of production” means the well, not the land, is capable of production. 
View the entire release here.

And here is the court's decision:




Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Popular posts from this blog

US Postal Service Subpoenas Chesapeake Energy on Royalty Payments

Company Looking for Permission to Build Two New Injection Wells in Ohio