Mouse Over to Stop Rotation & Read Ad

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Jack Chan Finds Data Supportive of Higher Oil Prices

Source: Jack Chan for The Energy Report   02/11/2017

View Original Article: https://www.streetwisereports.com/pub/na/jack-chan-finds-data-supportive-of-higher-oil-prices

Technical Analyst Jack Chan reads the charts and sees a major buy signal for energy.

Oil Services Index

$OSX is on a major buy signal, which can last for months and years.


COT report

COT data is supportive for overall higher oil prices.

VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF

OIH is one of a few energy sector ETFs we are holding for long term gains.
Prices dipped into our buy zone in November, and again this week.

Oil Services Index

Our trading model identifies the buy zones in a bull market, simple and effective.

Oil Services Index

Energy sector gave a major buy signal in 2016, and the current correction has dropped prices into our buy zone.

Summary

Energy sector is on a major buy signal.

Prices are now in our buy zone.

We are holding energy sector ETFs for long term gains.

Want to read more Energy Report articles like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent articles with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Articles page.

Disclosure:
1) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of Jack Chan and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. Jack Chan is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not involved in any aspect of the article preparation or editing so the author could speak independently about the sector. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports LLC for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
2) Jack Chan: We do not offer predictions or forecasts for the markets. What you see here is our simple trading model, which provides us the signals and set-ups to be either long, short, or in cash at any given time. Entry points and stops are provided in real time to subscribers, therefore, this update may not reflect our current positions in the markets. Trade at your own discretion. We also provide coverage to the major indexes and oil sector.
3) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
4) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.
Charts courtesy of Jack Chan


Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

PA Landowner Wins Case Against Chesapeake Energy Over Royalty Deductions

From Powersource:
For more than four years, the natural gas company tapping the Marcellus Shale beneath Paul Sidorek’s 150-acre property in rural northeastern Pennsylvania took deductions for preparing and shipping his share of the gas. The deductions reduced his royalties by $5,000 a month, sometimes more. 
Mr. Sidorek, an accountant, contested the charges and in September, the arbitrator who heard the case agreed with him. 
The wells’ operator, Chesapeake Energy Corp., had breached the terms of the lease agreement, the arbitrator found. He ordered the Oklahoma-based company to repay all of Mr. Sidorek’s past deductions and to stop taking them in the future. 
“To hold otherwise would be to render the express language of the lease prohibiting such deductions a nullity,” he wrote.
Read the whole article by clicking here.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Analyst: Predictions That Oil Industry is Dying Are Off Base

From Forbes contributor and analyst Michael Lynch:
Numerous prognosticators now claim that the petroleum industry is doomed to either a quick or a lingering death, as we ‘transition’ to a new energy economy. There are even statements from within the industry that seem to confirm this: A blogger for the Financial Times reports that a senior Shell executive thinks that demand could peak in five to fifteen years, adding “I think …possibly by 2020.” 
Two rationales are given for this change. Some see galloping improvements in competing technologies like photovoltaics and electric vehicles, the latter being particularly relevant, causing Bloomberg to predict: “Superior electric cars are on their way, and they could begin to wreck oil markets within a decade.” 
Then there are those arguing that fossil fuel reserves are due to be stranded by climate change policies and that the industry is greatly overstating their value, with one advocacy group arguing “The shocks to some industries could be severe—potentially as severe as, for example, the effect of the introduction of wireless telephony on the telecommunications sector during the 1990s….”

Graybeards like myself just shake our heads in wonder. Although many people have heard of the oft-repeated claim that electricity from nuclear power would be ‘too cheap to meter,’ few recall that there have been other threats and promises to transform the industry, especially due to technological advances.
Click here to read more.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Rover Pipeline Turns to Eminent Domain to Get Construction Started

From The Columbus Dispatch:
Trees are likely to fall soon to make way for a $4.2 billion natural-gas pipeline slicing through Ohio, according to an eminent-domain lawsuit filed in federal court in Columbus. 
Rover Pipeline said it must "complete all tree-felling activities" by March 31 to meet contractual obligations with gas shippers and "to reduce impacts, if any, on protected species of wildlife." 
"Rover must begin construction immediately," the suit says. 
The 713-mile pipeline received federal approval despite opposition from some communities along its path and being rerouted at least twice early in its planning. The federal government set the deadline so tree removal doesn't disturb federally protected bats that begin roosting in April.
Read the whole article by clicking here.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

UC Groundwater Fracking Study Celebrates One-Year Anniversary, Findings Still Not Published

by Jackie Stewart, Energy in Depth

It was one year ago that the University of Cincinnati released its data on the most comprehensive Utica Shale groundwater fracking study ever conducted in Ohio. The study found “no evidence for natural gas contamination” and was “disappointing” news to the anti-fracking community, which funded part of the study.  Despite the fact taxpayers also funded this study, the paper has yet to be published by a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
EID has been tracking this story for the past year, uncovering the study’s funding and calling question to the delay in publication. Recently, we asked the study’s lead researcher, Dr. Amy Townsend Small, to give us an update as to the status of UC’s publication efforts. She issued the following statement in response,
“I’m hopeful that the paper will be accepted for publication in 2017. It’s always been the goal of this and my other work, and we’ll keep working with the journals to try and make that happen. And, of course, we continue to publicize our results whenever the work is included in conferences.”
However, it was almost a year ago that Townsend Small stated in an email to the National Association of Royalty Owner’s (NARO) that UC is “currently working to prepare these data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.” In other words, it’s been one year and results are still the same.
At the end of the day, it’s on the University of Cincinnati to circulate the unpublished manuscript among the academic community to find a scientific publication to accept its findings. Without doing so, the research cannot be used for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews, such as the recent environmental assessment that was conducted for leasing in the Wayne National Forest.
While UC has stated it “did not fund the water sampling campaign” with taxpayer dollars, the study actually could not have been conducted without taxpayer-funded tools to determine its findings. According to UC’s own press release:
“Funding for the UC study was supported in coordination with …the Ohio Board of Regents… were also awarded a $400,000, 3-year grant from the National Science Foundation (EAR-1229114) for an isotope ratio mass spectrometer. The instrument measures the stable isotope composition of methane, which can indicate whether it is derived from biological activity or natural gas.” (emphasis added)
Moreover, according to the terms of the National Science Foundation grant, UC is required to produce the results of this study, including publication in a peer-reviewed journal. As the National Science Foundation’s grant award for the projects states:
“Results from research projects using this instrumentation will be disseminated through student and faculty presentations at national and international scientific meetings, publications in peer-reviewed journals, and online data repositories.”
UC’s indefinite delay in securing scientific journal publication of a study that found no water contamination from hydraulic fracturing — despite scrutinymedia attention, and numerous calls from groups and elected officials to do so — is all the more interesting considering UC was able publish the results of its 2015 study that claimed fracking was causing significant air pollution in Carroll County. That study appeared in Environmental Science & Technology just three months after it was completed.
But that study was quietly retracted due to “errors” and “incorrect” calculations. In fact, the researchers’ “honest calculation errors” in the original study led to an exaggeration in the cancer risk from PAH emissions in Carroll County by an astounding 7,250 times what the corrected study shows they actually are.
Both studies were first announced at events hosted by Carroll County Concerned Citizens (CCCC), a well-known anti-fracking group that has since dismantled. The same professor that presented the air quality study results to CCCC, study co-lead author Dr. Erin Hayes, has also participated in other anti-fracking events.
Making matters worse is the fact that the Carroll County air study was 100 percent taxpayer funded. UC’s Center for Environmental Genetics (CEG) received federal tax dollars for this study in the form of a grant from the NIH’s National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) for $47,910.
Additionally, UC and others have announced similar efforts to attract grant funding for studies all across the Utica Shale region. Most recently fringe environmental activists led by Columbus environmental lobbyists, the Ohio Environmental Council, announced their plans to chase taxpayer dollars toward a solution in search of a problem.
Ohioans deserve a full explanation as to why the two taxpayer-funded studies led by UC received two very different levels of attention in the scientific community. It’s been one year since UC announced the findings on its groundwater study (which cost taxpayers $400,000, by the way) and yet Ohioans are still waiting for the study to be peer-reviewed and published. By any measure, this example is of serious concern and the Ohio UC case study should pose a serious question to a larger problem that may exist with federal and state tax dollars being used to support academic research to drive a particular bias.
Is the academic community using taxpayer dollars to promote an agenda? Are studies that show that fracking is not causing widespread systemic groundwater contamination being muted by the refusal of scientific publications to review and publish data that does not fit their narrative?

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Monday, February 13, 2017

Five Companies Positioned for Healthy Returns as Energy Markets Recover

Source: Bill Newman for The Energy Report   02/09/2017

View Original Article: https://www.streetwisereports.com/pub/na/five-companies-positioned-for-healthy-returns-as-energy-markets-recover

Volatility in the oil and gas markets continues, with prices plunging yet again in the recent chaos surrounding Greece's default negotiations and other global political uncertainties. But a rebound is inevitable, and Mackie Research's Bill Newman has his eye on companies that have managed to grow, step by step, even in hard times. In this interview with The Energy Report, Newman identifies companies with individual stories that will, in the end, defy the trend.

Oil pump

The Energy Report: With the collapse of the crude oil price and the timing of a recovery difficult to predict, the energy sector has fallen out of favor with investors. In the current oil and gas investment climate, are there any stocks that are immune to the negative sentiment and can still perform?

Bill Newman: We had low commodities prices over the past two years, which have really hit the junior oil and gas sector hard, alongside the corresponding valuations and share prices of many small-cap energy companies—but this is where the opportunity exists for investors today. The companies that have survived are generally underleveraged and it's been incredible how efficient they've become in driving down drilling and completion costs. These companies have been able to really improve the well economics and are generating strong returns even at lower commodity prices. With a stronger and more stable oil price outlook expected in 2017, activity is starting to pick up and investors should be once again looking at those juniors that have survived the last two years, as they are positioned for healthy returns as the energy market firms back up and gets back to business.

TER: So which small-cap energy companies do you like right now?

BN: Domestically, we like companies that are applying horizontal drilling and multi-stage frac technology to unlock the Mannville oil and gas trend in Alberta. Generally, the well costs are low and the reserves sizable, so the economics are very attractive. The three Mannville players we like are Point Loma Resources Ltd. (PLX:TSX), Prairie Provident Resources Inc. (PPR:TSX) and Altura Energy Inc. (ATU:TSX.V). All three are relatively new companies with clean balance sheets, are opportunity rich, and we expect them to show substantial growth this year.

TER: Let's take your first pick, Point Loma. What makes it stand out?

BN: Point Loma Resources is a new start-up and it holds a huge concentrated land base of over 200,000 net acres in west central Alberta with a massive horizontal drilling inventory (over 400 horizontal locations). The company was founded by a strong management team and board that are from highly successful oil and gas start-ups including Painted Pony, Thunder Energy, Surge Energy and Ember Resources. Production has built very quickly from around 135 barrels of oil equivalent per day1(35 boe/d) when it went public in July 2016 to an exit 2016 rate of 570 boe/d, mostly through the tie-in of behind pipe production volumes. In late January 2017, Point Loma announced an acquisition of an additional ~400 boe/d of production that came with over 55,000 net acres of land, which is a perfect fit with its existing assets. So we expect Point Loma will be producing over 1,100 boe/d by the end of Q1/17 through the tie-in of additional behind pipe volumes and increase to over 1,750 boe/d by year-end.

With so much land and a very large drilling inventory we expect production to continue to grow for many years. Through acquisitions and organic growth, Point Loma is targeting to grow to 10,000 boe/d within four to five years and this team has done it before. Valuation wise, given the company is not well known as a new start-up yet, Point Loma is one of the cheapest stocks in the domestic Canadian space today, trading far below where it should be and management's average cost is approximately $0.59/share (versus the current trading price of $0.58/share), which means investors today can buy in and be aligned with management as they create value in the future for shareholders.

TER: What about Prairie Provident? How is it different from Point Loma?

BN: Prairie Provident Resources is also targeting Mannville plays within Alberta. The company is a little larger with current production of approximately 5,500 boe/d and should be over 6,000 boe/d by year-end. Prairie Provident has an inventory of over 170 horizontal development drilling locations, which should generate stable growth for many years.

The company is cheap on a net asset value basis. In January the company released its year-end 2016 reserves that showed a proven developed producing valued at approximately $1.14/share versus the current market price of around $0.72. In other words it is trading below its PDP value and a big discount to its proven plus probable value of $2.17/share. Prairie Provident is also cheap on a cash flow basis, trading at just a 2.5x multiple of our 2017 cash flow forecast. We think the discount will start to shrink as the company achieves its production targets and becomes better known by the market.

TER: What else can you tell us about Prairie Provident?

BN: Investors might be unaware that Prairie Provident holds over 230,000 net acres in the Saint Lawrence Lowlands in Quebec that is prospective for the Utica Shale. Later this year the Quebec government could release new regulations that govern the oil and gas industry that might lead to the drilling of the Utica, which was pretty much shut down in 2011. It's unclear how attractive or restrictive the new regulations will be but the Quebec play is really a free option for investors in the Prairie Provident asset base.

TER: And Altura? What's its story?

BN: Altura Energy Inc. was founded by high profile board members, including Darren Gee, president & CEO of Peyto Exploration, and Brian Laverne, president & CEO of Storm Resources, and is run by an experienced CEO, David Burghardt (ex-Vermillion Energy).

Altura's assets are located in east central Alberta and the company is targeting oil within the Upper Mannville Group, specifically the Sparky and Rex reservoirs. Management has applied its extensive experience in horizontal drilling and completion technology to achieve the lowest well costs with industry-leading rates of return. The well economics are great because the Sparky and Rex reservoirs have large oil in place, with low drilling and operating costs.

Like Point Loma and Prairie Provident, Altura is a growth story focused on the Mannville. The company has taken production from about 400 bbl/d last year to over 900 boe/d currently and it should exit this year with over 1,350 boe/d. And it is in good shape financially with no debt and current working capital of about $9 million, and it should fund most of its 2017 drilling program with cash flow.

The next catalyst should be the release of its reserves report on February 24. Altura had a 100% drilling success rate in 2016 so reserves should look good.

TER: What about international companies? What's your strategy there?

BN: Internationally, we like companies that can grow production through lower risk appraisal and development plays, as well as those international companies with exposure to massive high-impact higher-reward resources plays or exploration and appraisal upside for speculative appeal. The attractiveness to invest in small-cap international energy companies is gaining exposure to plays that can potentially provide investors to multi-bagger upside, targeting resources in the 50 million to billion-plus barrel size.

So we like Condor Petroleum Inc. (CPI:TSX). The company has a 100% interest in licences in Thrace Basin in Western Turkey and in the Pre-Caspian Basin in Kazakhstan. Condor has made discoveries in both countries and has recently started light oil production of 500 bbl/d in Kazakhstan. We expect first natural gas production of about 10 million cubic feet per day (10 mmcf/d) in Turkey to start up in the second quarter of this year. That should give the company a cash flow base to fund more development in both countries.

The natural gas field in Turkey is called the Poyraz Ridge, and Condor just finished a very successful four-well drilling program to develop and appraise the field. All four wells were successful and Condor discovered natural gas at a greater depth than was previous known, so it has substantially increased the mapped reservoir area. The company also found two new deeper reservoirs that could have significant resource potential, so we expect a substantial increase in the reserves of Poyraz Ridge field. Also later this year, Condor plans to drill the Yakamoz 1 exploration prospect that is structurally similar to Poyraz Ridge field, which is only 2 km away.

TER: What's the high impact upside with Condor?

BN: The big exploration plays are in Kazakhstan. Condor holds a 100% interest in the Zharkamys West 1 block, which is in western Kazakhstan in the Pre-Caspian Basin. The basin has super-giant oil fields including the 13-billion-barrel Kashagan field and the 9-billion-barrel Tengiz field. Later this year Condor plans to drill the Korumbet NW exploration well targeting an intra-salt structure that has the potential to hold a recoverable resource of 45 million barrels. But the real upside is the pre-salt play. The cost of the well could be $25 million, so Condor will need to secure a partner before it can try to drill a potential company maker.

TER: Any other international names with big upside?

BN: Madalena Energy Inc. (MVN:TSX.V; MDLNF:OTCPK) has certainly had its ups and downs in the downturn of the energy market, but we think the company is finally turning the corner. In January, the company farmed out a 55% interest in the Coirón Amargo Sur Este block to Pan American Energy LLC. Madalena keeps a 35% stake in this prime Vaca Muerta shale asset and received US$10 million in cash and a carry on a two-well drilling program. The first high impact horizontal well targeting the Vaca Muerta shale should spud in the first quarter. The deal with Pan American has not only put Madalena back in business, it should also get the market excited again as horizontal drilling begins in the Vaca Muerta shale and there is the potential for a carried deep gas test by Pan American Energy.

TER: Is the investment situation in Argentina improving?

BN: The situation has definitely improved since Argentina's new president, Mauricio Macri, took office in December 2015. Macri cut farm export taxes, lowered personal incomes taxes and reduced utility subsides. He lifted currency controls, which allowed the Argentina peso to float for the first time since January 2002. The Macri government also lifted restriction of capital movements out of the country. In January 2017, the government announced that it will maintain the natural gas price at US$7.50/mmbtu. The federal government and the provincial government of Neuquén reached an agreement with the labor unions to reduce costs in exchange for increased investment. As a result YPF, Total, Shell, Chevron, Dow and Madalena's new partner Pan American Energy pledged to invest a combined US$5 billion in 2017 in the development of the Vaca Muerta shale play, increasing to US$15 billion per year starting in 2018.

TER: What's the direct impact on Madalena?

BN: Madalena has a number of high-quality blocks Argentina and is actively looking for a deal to appraise and monetize the huge potential resource on its blocks. In November 2015, the company released the results of an independent resource estimate of the Vaca Muerta and Lower Agrio shale within two key blocks within the Neuquén basin in Argentina. The total net unrisked contingent and prospective resource within the Coiron Amargo and Curamhuele blocks was estimated at over 1.5 billion boe. The improved political and fiscal situation in Argentina and the massive injection of new capital into the energy sector can only help MVN secure a sale as a potential takeout target or joint venture on one or more of its assets, which would be a huge catalyst for the stock. At the current market price the company trades at a deep discount to the value of its conventional producing assets alone, giving no value to the potential of the Vaca Muerta shale and Lower Agrio Shale resources tha t the company holds.

TER: Thank you for your time, Bill.

Bill Newman is vice president of international and domestic oil and gas research with Mackie Research Capital Corp. He has been an energy analyst for 21 years. He holds a bachelor's degree in commerce from the University of Calgary, and has a CFA designation.

Want to read more Energy Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles and interviews have been published. To see a list of recent articles and interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Articles page.

Disclosure:
1) Patrice Fusillo compiled this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC. She provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. She owns, or members of her immediate household or family own, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. She is, or members of her immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Bill Newman: I own, or members of my immediate household or family own, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: : Within the last three years, Mackie Research Capital has managed or comanaged an offering of securities for, and received compensation for investment banking and related services from Madalena Energy Inc. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I determined and had final say over which companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts' statements without their consent.
5) The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview or article until after it publishes.


Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Latest Utica Shale Permitting Report: Rig Count Drops Again

The Ohio Department of Natural Resources has released the latest weekly permitting report for horizontal drilling in the state's Utica shale play, and the Utica rig count has continued the recent trend by dropping again.

Eight new permits were issued last week.  Six of the permits listed are for wells in Monroe County, while two were for Belmont County sites.

This brings the new total of horizontal drilling permits issued to 2,381.  1,899 wells have been drilled, and 1,486 wells are producing.  The rig count is down from 21 last week to 20 on this latest report.

View the report by clicking here.

Connect with us on Facebook and Twitter!

Thursday, February 9, 2017

Report: Ohio Counties Have Received Over $43 Million in Real Estate Property Taxes from Utica Shale Production

by Jackie Stewart, Energy in Depth

Ohio’s top six Utica Shale counties collected more than $43.7 million in real estate property taxes on production from 2010-2015, according to a new report by Energy In Depth and the Ohio Oil and Gas Association. The report entitled “The Utica Shale Local Support Series: Ohio’s Oil and Gas Industry Property Tax Payments,” consults ad valorem tax collection data from six Utica Shale mineral producing counties from 2010-2015 to examine the impact made from the first three years of Utica Shale production in these six counties. The report includes breakout statistics for each county as well, including BelmontCarrollGuernseyHarrisonMonroe and Noble.
Below are the report’s key findings, by the numbers,
  • Real Estate Property Tax Paid for Six Counties
$43.7 Million
  • Projected Property Taxes To Be Paid (2016-2026)
$200-$250 Million
  • Amount of Tax Directly Paid to Local Government/Schools
100 Percent
  • Percent of Property Tax Collection to Ohio Local Schools
60-70 Percent
The report helps to quantify taxes to be paid over the next 10 years, based on payments already received to six counties from the first three years of Utica Shale production (taxes collected in the latest year available, 2015, reflect 2013 production). Using the Freedom of Information Act, we were able to obtain the data from these six counties on real estate property taxes collected, as well as the breakout of real estate property taxes paid specifically from wells or ad valorem taxes.
Considering Utica Shale oil production has increased by 496 percent and natural gas production has increased by 852 percent since 2013, it is reasonable to conservatively project Ohio Utica Shale counties will reasonably receive an additional $200-$250 million boost from real estate property taxes on wells over the course of 10 years (2016-2026).  Of course this is only one tax the oil and natural gas industry pays in Ohio. As EID has previously reported, sales tax revenues have skyrocketed by 65 percent in these same counties over the past five year as well. Real estate taxes paid on wells accounted for, on average, 22 percent of the total real estate property taxes paid in 2015 to these counties.
To access the full report, and the county specific fact sheets, click the links below:

NOTE: We are embedding all of these files in this post.  Just click on read more to view them.

Follow by Email